Friday, March 23, 2007

Demolition and Relocation


The photo of a Chongqing's "nail household" (釘子戶, a person or a family who refuses to move out during urban demolition and relocation) has circulated on internet for a while. I'm sure many people are stunned by this urban spectacle unique to contemporary China.

I feels neither optimistic nor pessimistic about the Property Law (Wuquan fa, 物權法). While some old leftists are worried about the public ownership as the foundation of socialist system challenged by this law, I suggest them show more care about the ordinary people's private property destroyed by the collusion of government and big capital. Many district governments of Chinese cities continue to demolish people's home in the name of "public interest". With or without this law, this brutal process will continue. All in all this is not simply a legal issue.

Now this "Chongqing nail household" turnes into a standstill. Hu Guo guessed that the high-ranking officials would settle down this issue in private. Now the developer is not able to remove him violently because he is under the spotlight of media. But the government would not support him publicly because this nail household might set an example for residents in the future.

Today Wang Xiaofeng made the association of urban demolition and relocation with sina blog. Some famous bloggers, such as Shu kewen, are "relocated" to sina without their consent. Sina wants to use these celebrities to promote its internet services. Wang asked: Could we sue Sina with the newly enacted Property Law?


Photo: Down in the Blue

Labels: , , ,

4 Comments:

At 8:46 PM, Anonymous sunfai said...

the newest edition of 南風窗 wrote a commentary on how the establishment property right would contribute to the development of basic human right and political rights.

i've heard that apart from the orthodox marxist, there are some criticism on 物權法 about the possibility of justifying officials for stealing national property during the last 25 years by exploiting their administrative power.

 
At 10:26 PM, Blogger hegelchong said...

i will try to read 南風窗's article.

could you tell me the source of the criticism on 物權法 apart from orthodox marxists?

thanks.

 
At 11:23 AM, Anonymous sunfai said...

i think i've read that from Mingpao, either by 秦勝 or 戴胡子 during the 'two conferences'.

 
At 10:10 PM, Anonymous www.burgos-3d.com said...

Oh my god, there is a great deal of worthwhile data above!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home